Is Backdating Stock Options Legal?

Backdating stock options is the practice of issuing stock options at a later date than the one shown on the options themselves. The practice is highly controversial, although it is not illegal by itself. It is only when it is used in a deceptive way to cover up accounting irregularities that it becomes against the law. There are many cases where there is an inevitable degree of backdating, due to the fat that a large options issue may take some time to put into place.

Many corporations defend their right to issue backdated options, stating truthfully that there is nothing illegal or immoral about it as long as there is full disclosure. The right to issue options which are already what is known as “in the money”, that is the underlying stock could already be sold at a profit, is also firmly established in law. The difficulty again occurs when the system is abused and subjected to deception. As the tax implications are totally different with “in the money” options, there is a considerable incentive for companies to try to game the system.

Because of certain high profile cases in which stock backdating has occurred, there is a considerable public misconception that it is totally illegal. This is, as we have seen, not the case, as has been established by federal judge. This misconception has led to an unfortunate association in the minds of the public of legitimate stock backdating with executive corruption even when there is nothing underhand going on. It is usually accurate reporting which is the key issue. Providing this happens, there is not usually anything underhand occurring.

The issuing of stock options is usually designed as a means to attract workers whose services are in demand, by offering them a stable benefit which will increase over time. The expectation is that the stock will rise, allowing employees the possibility to purchase the share at a predetermined lower price. It is obviously hoped that the employee will continue to hold the stock as an affirmation of faith in the company policies and of the future. The employee, however, is never under any obligation to do this.

There will usually be some kind of restrictive clause which will determine when it is possible for the employee to take up the options. This is because the employer does not want workers to just take a quick windfall and then move to a competing organization. Often, you will need to serve for two years before you have the right to claim your options. Of course, the price may be fluctuating wildly at this time in the future. It is this exact timing difficulty that leads to the potential issue with backdating stock options.

 

 

trading stock options

 

Trading Stock Options - Click Here

 

Stock Trading News:

 

Life Doesn't Have to Be So Complicated - MarketWatch (press release)

Life Doesn't Have to Be So Complicated
MarketWatch (press release)
Life insurance is frequently offered in employee benefit packages provided by employers. As economic pressures force employers to trim budgets and benefits, .

and more »
..


Texas opens inquiry into Google search rankings EUR The Associated .
Seattle Post IntelligencerTexas opens inquiry into Google search rankingsThe Associated PressSAN FRANCISCO EUR” Google Inc.'s methods for recommending websites are being reviewed by Texas' attorney general in an investigation spurred by ...


BP replaces failed blowout preventer on Gulf well EUR Reuters .
Boston GlobeBP replaces failed blowout preventer on Gulf wellReutersHOUSTON, Sept 3 (Reuters) - BP Plc (BP.L)(BP.N) successfully replaced a failed blowout preventer from atop its ruptured Gulf of Mexico oil well late on Friday, ...


Stock Trading On New York Stock Exchange EUR How It All Happens .
Stock Trading On New York Stock Exchange EUR How It All Happens? Posted by z on September 4, 2010 Leave a comment (0) Go to comments. Just imagine that you are a shareholder of a company XYZ and are trying to sell your shares in the ...


Union Or Not, Government Workers Squeezed - NPR

Union Or Not, Government Workers Squeezed
NPR
"It was the right time to cut employee benefits and they jumped on the bandwagon," he says. Public employees elsewhere have suffered black eyes from some .

and more »
..


US companies shift bigger share of health care costs onto workers - World Socialist Web Site

TopNews United Kingdom (blog)

US companies shift bigger share of health care costs onto workers
World Socialist Web Site
. of employers offering health benefits reported that they had reduced benefits or increased employee cost sharing this year due to the economic downturn. .
Workers are paying more for health insuranceNorthJersey.com
Employees Pay More and Get Less from Medical CoverageMedPage Today
Survey: Employers passing larger share of health insurance costs on to workersAustin American-Statesman
Stockton Record -Kansas City Star -TopNews United Kingdom (blog)
all 558 news articles »
..


 

stock options trading

 

Discover Hot To Trade Stock Options - Click Here

 

Many, if not all of the links on this website are affiliate links which means that we will be compensated if you choose to buy at some point in the near future. Please accept our sincere thanks for your support.


Technorati Tags: , ,